由网友(离人梦)分享简介：是否有可能，不使用的PInvoke，使用.NET重新启动电脑？Is it possible, without employing pinvoke, to restart a PC using .NET?我只是重复了冠军，但我不太清楚如何更进一步阐述！I kind of just repeated the titl...

是否有可能，不使用的PInvoke，使用.NET重新启动电脑？

Is it possible, without employing pinvoke, to restart a PC using .NET?

我只是重复了冠军，但我不太清楚如何更进一步阐述！

I kind of just repeated the title, but I'm not too sure how to elaborate much further!

编辑：

我应该提到不希望使用执行shutdown -r作为解决方案。

I should have mentioned that don't want to use "shutdown -r" as a solution.

我是真的后，一个纯粹的.NET的方式，是这样的：

I was really after a pure .NET way, something like:

Environment.ShutDown（）;

在换句话说，即保持与.NET的出现新版本的Windows的东西。

In other words, something that is maintained with .NET as new versions of Windows arise.

修改2：

请的，别再问这有什么错的P / Invoke。这些种类的答案是完全有啥用户似乎更喜欢;所谓横向的方式来回答问题。然而，虽然没有真正的问题的P / Invoke，我会很乐意使用它，地球上有什么问题，询问是否有.NET实现一些更正式的方式？如果它在.NET那么操作系统之间的API的变化将（最有可能）得到体现。不管什么原因，它不是犯罪，寻求以最小化DLL导入的用法是什么呢？

Please stop asking "what's wrong with p/invoke". Those sort of answers are exactly what SO users seem to love; the supposed "lateral" approach to answering a question. However, although there is no real problem with p/invoke and I will happily use it, what on earth is wrong with asking if .NET has a more official way of achieving something? If it's in .NET then any API changes between OSes will (most likely) get reflected. Whatever the reason, it's not a crime to seek to minimise DLL import usage is it?

我敢肯定，如果我包括东西的问题，如：

I'm sure if I included something in a question like:

[DllImport("something32.dll")]
static extern int ClimbWall32Ex(IntPtr32 blah);

和你可能只是做：

SomeNamespace.ClimbWall();

大家一个在这里会尖叫：什么是错用 SomeNamespace.ClimbWall（）; ？

唉。

推荐答案

您需要调用ExitWindowsEx这是唯一可通过的DllImport

You need to call ExitWindowsEx which is only available through DllImport