由网友(谁还记得谁)分享简介：我不知道是否有一种简单的方法来恢复永久冰川对象S3。似乎可以恢复冰川对象为你提供恢复到S3时，一定的时间。因此，例如，我们现在有成千上万的文件还原到S3，将回到冰川在90天内，但我们不希望他们回来的冰川。 I'm wondering whether there is an easy way to permanentl...

我不知道是否有一种简单的方法来恢复永久冰川对象S3。似乎可以恢复冰川对象为你提供恢复到S3时，一定的时间。因此，例如，我们现在有成千上万的文件还原到S3，将回到冰川在90天内，但我们不希望他们回来的冰川。

I'm wondering whether there is an easy way to permanently restore Glacier objects to S3. It seems that you can restore Glacier objects for the certain amount of time you provide when restoring to S3. So for example, we have now thousands of files restored to S3 that will get back to Glacier in 90 days but we do not want them back in Glacier.

推荐答案

要澄清一个技术性问题上的一个点，你的文件也不会回去冰川在90天内 - 因为他们仍然在冰川，但因为你已经做了恢复，也有临时副本生活在S3减少冗余存储（RRS）的S3将在90天内（或当你做了还原操作指定。恢复文件不会删除冰川副本。任何一天值删除

To clarify a technicality on one point, your files will not "go back to" Glacier in 90 days -- because they are still in Glacier, but since you have done a restore, there are temporary copies living in S3 reduced redundancy storage (RRS) that S3 will delete in 90 days (or whatever day value you specified when you did the restore operation. Restoring files doesn't remove the Glacier copy.

在回答你的问题是没有的，是的。

The answer to your question is no, and yes.

您不能在技术上从冰川存储类改变一个对象回标准或RRS类...

You cannot technically change an object from the Glacier storage class back to the standard or RRS class...

对象冰川存储类的转换是一个way.You无法使用的生命周期配置规则来存储类的对象，从冰川到标准或RRS转换。

The transition of objects to the GLACIER storage class is one-way.You cannot use a lifecycle configuration rule to convert the storage class of an object from GLACIER to Standard or RRS.

...但是...

如果你想存储类的已归档的对象更改为标准或RRS，必须使用还原操作，使临时副本第一。然后使用复制操作来覆盖对象作为标准或RRS对象。

If you want to change the storage class of an already archived object to either Standard or RRS, you must use the restore operation to make a temporary copy first. Then use the copy operation to overwrite the object as a Standard or RRS object.

http://docs.aws.amazon.com/AmazonS3/latest/dev/object-lifecycle-mgmt.html

您可以复制的对象是什么，从技术上说，一个新的对象，而是一个具有与新对象相同的密钥（路径）...所以出于实用的目的，是的，可以。

You can copy that object to what is, technically, a new object, but one that has the same key (path) as the new object... so for practical purposes, yes, you can.

在PUT / COPY动作在这里讨论： http://docs.aws.amazon.com/AmazonS3/latest/dev/ChgStoClsOfObj.html

The PUT/COPY action is discussed here: http://docs.aws.amazon.com/AmazonS3/latest/dev/ChgStoClsOfObj.html